Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 089
Original file (2012 089.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2012-089

 

      

RELIEF REQUESTED
BY DRB
CORRECTIONS

TIS 1 yrs, | months, 16 days

      

  

 

Policy Implications None

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to involvement with drugs. The applicant was awarded NJP
for wrongful use of a controlled substance (Ecstacy) in late 2000.

The applicant has provided no evidence to challenge the discharge in early 2001. The applicant is merely
asking for an upgrade for better employment and economic status.

The Board finds no issues with propriety in this case. The Board finds no issues of equity in this case. Coast
Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for
individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The applicant has not provided any

evidence to support a request for an upgrade based upon the equity standard.

The Board recommends no relief.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 065

    Original file (2012 065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues of equity in this case. The applicant contends that the Discharge should have been processed through the physical disability evaluation system (PDES) vice separated for misconduct. Based off current policy, The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable and the most favorable character of service authorized for personnel separated as a result of involvement with drugs.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 076

    Original file (2012 076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety in this case. The Board finds no issues of equity in this case. Therefore, the applicant should be issued a DD-215 reflecting this administrative change.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 031

    Original file (2014 031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 059

    Original file (2013 059.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Therefore, based on the post-separation policy, the Board recommends that the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions. In accordance with ALCOAST 562/08, the character of service be amended to Under Honorable Conditions based on the post- separation policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 012

    Original file (2013 012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge separation due to a drug incident. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 046

    Original file (2014 046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 002

    Original file (2014 002.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Per post policy noted in ALCOAST 562/08, a General discharge is no longer considered an official character of service.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 047

    Original file (2014 047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board endorses an administrative change to amend the Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions based on the issuance of ALCOAST 562/08. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General Discharge, with an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 004

    Original file (2014 004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with drugs in 2011. The applicant admitted to the Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) in the Fall of 2010 to using marijuana on different occasions. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 075

    Original file (2012 075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Prior to the applicant’s drug use in 2011, ALCOAST 605/10 was in place to specifically list Spice as an illegal drug, and usage of said substance would result in a Discharge from the service. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.